Skip to content

Urges Onto the Whale-road the Unresisting Heart

Forþon nu min hyge hweorfeð ofer hreþerlocan,
min modsefa mid mereflode,
ofer hwæles eþel hweorfeð wide,
eorþan sceatas—cymeð eft to me
gifre ond grædig; gielleð anfloga,
hweteð on hwælweg hreþer unwearnum
ofer holma gelagu.
And now my spirit twists out of my breast,
my spirit out in the waterways,
over the whale’s path it soars widely
through all the corners of the world—it comes back to me
eager and unsated; the lone-flier screams,
urges onto the whale-road the unresisting heart
across the waves of the sea.

—excerpted from The Seafarer

Hope They Get Into Your Work, Eventually

You can read Mailer or Hemingway and see—or at least I do—that what separated them from greater writers (like Chekhov, say) was a certain failing of kindness or compassion or gentleness—an interest in the little guy, i.e., the nonglamorous little guy, a willingness and ability to look at all of their characters with love.

[Tobias Wolff] was the first great writer I ever met and what the meeting did for me was disabuse me of the idea that a writer had to be a dysfunctional crazy person. […] Toby was loving, gentle, funny, kind, wise—yet he was producing these works of great (sometimes dark) genius. It was invigorating to be reminded that great writing was (1) mysterious and (2) not linked, in any reductive, linear way, to the way one lived: wild writing could come from a life that was beautifully under control. Watching him, I felt: O.K., nurture the positive human parts of yourself and hope they get into your work, eventually.

A work of art is something produced by a person, but is not that person—it is of her, but is not her. It’s a reach, really—the artist is trying to inhabit, temporarily, a more compact, distilled, efficient, wittier, more true-seeing, precise version of herself—one that she can’t replicate in so-called ‘real’ life, no matter how hard she tries. That’s why she writes: to try and briefly be more than she truly is.

—George Saunders, from Margo Rabb’s essay in the NYT, “Fallen Idols

Let the Pupil Write the Description of a Tree

It is said that Flaubert taught De Maupassant to write. When De Maupassant returned from a walk Flaubert would ask him to describe someone, say a concierge whom they would both pass in their next walk, and to describe the person so that Flaubert would recognize, say, the concierge and not mistake her for some other concierge and not the one De Maupassant had described.

—Ezra Pound, ABC of Reading

Miyazaki’s Top Fifty Book Recommendations

From the exhibition at the Setagaya Literary Museum in Tokyo in honor of the 60th anniversary of the Iwanami boys’ books series.

  1. Le Petit Prince (The Little Prince) — Antoine de Saint-Exupéry (1943)
  2. Il Romanzo di Cipollino (The Adventures of Little Onion) — Gianni Rodari (1956)
  3. The Rose and the Ring — William Makepeace Thackeray (1854)
  4. The Little Bookroom — Eleanor Farjeon (1955)
  5. The Three Musketeers — Alexandre Dumas (1844)
  6. The Secret Garden — Frances Eliza Hodgson Burnett (1909)
  7. Die Nibelungensage (The Legend of the Nibelungs) — Gustav Schalk (1953)
  8. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland — Lewis Carroll (1865)
  9. The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes — Arthur Conan Doyle (1891)
  10. A Norwegian Farm —Marie Hamsun (1933)
  11. Конёк-горбунок (The Humpbacked Horse) — Пётр Па́влович Ершо́в (Pyotr Pavlovich Yershov) (1834)
  12. Souvenirs entomologiques — Jean-Henri Casimir Fabre (1879-1907)
  13. Toui Mukashi no Fushigina Hanashi-Nihon Reiiki — Tsutomu Minakami (1995)
  14. Иван-дурак (Ivan the Fool) — Leo Tolstoy (1885)
  15. Eagle of the Ninth — Rosemary Sutcliff (1954)
  16. Winnie-the-Pooh — A. A. Milne (1926)
  17. Les Princes du Vent (The Princes of the Wind) — Michel-Aime Baudouy (1956)
  18. When Marnie Was There — Joan G Robinson (1967)
  19. The Long Winter — Laura Ingalls Wilder (1940)
  20. The Wind in the Willows — Kenneth Grahame (1908)
  21. The Ship That Flew — Hilda Lewis (1939)
  22. Flambards — Kathleen Wendy Peyton (1967)
  23. Tom’s Midnight Garden — Ann Philippa Pearce (1958)
  24. The Adventures of Tom Sawyer — Mark Twain (1876)
  25. Chumon no Ooi Ryouriten (The Restaurant of Many Orders) — Kenji Miyazawa (1924)
  26. Heidi — Johanna Spyri (1888)
  27. Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea — Jules Verne (1870)
  28. The Borrowers — Mary Norton (1952)
  29. Devatero pohádek (Nine Fairy Tales) — Karel ÄŒapek (1931)
  30. Swallows and Amazons — Arthur Ransome (1930)
  31. The Flying Classroom — Erich Kästner (1933)
  32. Robinson Crusoe — Daniel Defoe (1719)
  33. Treasure Island — Robert Louis Stevenson (1883)
  34. Двена́дцать ме́сяцев (Twelve Months: A Fairy-Tale) — Samuil Marshak (1943)
  35. Tistou les pouces verts (Tistou of the Green Thumbs) — Maurice Druon (1957)
  36. The man who planted the welsh onions — Kim Soun (1953)
  37. Strange Stories from a Chinese Studio — Pu Songling (1740)
  38. The Voyages of Doctor Dolittle — Hugh John Lofting (1922)
  39. 西遊記 (Journey to the West) — Wú Chéng’Ä“n (1500~?)
  40. Little Lord Fauntleroy — Frances Eliza Hodgson Burnett (1886)
  41. From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler — Elaine Lobl Konigsburg(1968)
  42. Alla vi barn i Bullerbyn (The Children of Noisy Village) — Astrid Lindgren (1947)
  43. The Hobbit, or There and Back Again — J.R.R. Tolkien (1937)
  44. A Wizard of Earthsea — Ursula K. Le Guin (1968)
  45. The Little White Horse — Elizabeth Goudge (1946)
  46. Bylo nas pet (There Were Five) — Karel Polacek (1969)
  47. City Neighbor: The Story of Jane Addams — Clara Ingram Judson (1951)
  48. The Radium Woman: a Life of Madame Curie — Eleanor Doorly (1939)
  49. The Otterbury Incident — Cecil Day-Lewis (1948)
  50. Hans Brinker or The Silver Skates — Mary Mapes Dodge (1865)

Worlds of Lost Possibilities

Life is a winking light in the darkness.

I try to dig deep into the well of my subconscious. At a certain moment in that process, the lid is opened and very different ideas and visions are liberated. With those I can start making a film. But maybe it’s better that you don’t open that lid completely, because if you release your subconscious it becomes really hard to live a social or family life.

The concept of portraying evil and then destroying it—I know this is considered mainstream, but I think it is rotten. This idea that whenever something evil happens someone particular can be blamed and punished for it, in life and in politics, is hopeless.

I am a pessimist. But when I’m making a film, I don’t want to transfer my pessimism onto children. I keep it at bay. I don’t believe that adults should impose their vision of the world on children, children are very much capable of forming their own visions. There’s no need to force our own visions onto them.

To be born means being compelled to choose an era, a place, a life. To exist here, now, means to lost the possibility of being countless other potential selves… Yet once being born there is no turning back. And I think that’s exactly why the fantasy worlds of cartoon movies so strongly represent our hopes and yearnings. They illustrate a world of lost possibilities for us.

—quotes from Hayao Miyazaki, various sources

Twenty-three Monosyllabic Words for Boat

barge
bark
brig
cog
fluyt
hoy
hulk
junk
karve
ketch
knarr
koff
pink
pram
rig
scow
skiff
sloop
smack
snaw
yacht
yawl
yoal

(and all are different)

Linkdump June

Allzu Menschlich (Lawrence on Melville)

Melville has the strange, uncanny magic of sea-creatures, and some of their repulsiveness. He isn’t quite a land animal. There is something slithery about him. Something always half-seas-over. In his life they said he was mad—or crazy. He was neither mad nor crazy. But he was over the border. He was half a water animal, like those terrible yellow-bearded Vikings who broke out of the waves in beaked ships.

He was a modern Viking. There is something curious about real blue-eyed people. They are never quite human, in the good classic sense, human as brown-eyed people are human: the human of the living humus. About a real blue-eyed person there is usually something abstract, elemental. Brown-eyed people are, as it were, like the earth, which is tissue of bygone life, organic, compound. In blue eyes there is sun and rain and abstract, uncreate element, water, ice, air, space, but not humanity. Brown-eyed people are people of the old, old world: Allzu menschlich. Blue-eyed people tend to be too keen and abstract.

Melville is like a Viking going home to the sea, encumbered with age and memories, and a sort of accomplished despair, almost madness. For he cannot accept humanity. He can’t belong to humanity. Cannot.

and

The sea-born people, who can meet and mingle no longer: who turn away from life, to the abstract, to the elements: the sea receives her own.

Let life come asunder, they say. Let water conceive no more with fire. Let mating finish. Let the elements leave off kissing, and turn their backs on one another. Let the merman turn away from his human wife and children, let the seal-woman forget the world of men, remembering only the waters.

So they go down to the sea, the sea-born people. The Vikings are wandering again. Homes are broken up. Cross the seas, cross the seas, urges the heart. Leave love and home. Leave love and home. Love and home are a deadly illusion. Woman, what have I to do with thee? It is finished. Consummatum est. The crucihxion into humanity is over. Let us go back to the fierce, uncanny elements: the corrosive vast sea. Or Fire.

Basta! It is enough. It is enough of life. Let us have the vast elements. Let us get out of this loathsome complication of living humanly with humans. Let the sea wash us clean of the leprosy of our humanity and humanness.

and

Melville writhed for eighty years.

In his soul he was proud and savage.

But in his mind and will he wanted the perfect fulfilment of love; he wanted the lovey-doveyness of perfect mutual understanding.

[…]

Right to the end he could never accept the fact that perfect relationships cannot be. Each soul is alone, and the aloneness of each soul is a double barrier to perfect relationship between two beings.

Each soul should be alone. And in the end the desire for a ‘perfect relationship’ is just a vicious, unmanly craving. ‘Tous nos malheurs viennent de ne pouvoir etre seuls.’

Melville, however, refused to draw his conclusion. Life was wrong, he said. He refused Life. But he stuck to his ideal of perfect relationship, possible perfect love. The world ought to be a harmonious loving place. And it can’t be. So life itself is wrong.

It is silly arguing. Because, after all, only temporary man sets up the ‘oughts’.

The world ought not to be a harmonious loving place. It ought to be a place of fierce discord and intermittent harmonies: which it is.

Love ought not to be perfect. It ought to have perfect moments, and wildernesses of thorn bushes – which it has.

A ‘perfect’ relationship ought not to be possible. Every relationship should have its absolute limits, its absolute reserves, essential to the singleness of the soul in each person. A truly perfect relationship is one in which each party leaves great tracts unknown in the other party.

No two persons can meet at more than a few points, consciously. If two people can just be together fairly often, so that the presence of each is a sort of balance to the other, that is the basis of perfect relationship. There must be true separatenesses as well.

Melville was, at the core, a mystic and an idealist.

Perhaps, so am I.

And he stuck to his ideal guns.

I abandon mine.

—D.H. Lawrence, Studies in Classic American Literature, chapter 10, Herman Melville’s Typee and Omoo

Always Forming New Wholes

The difference is not a simple difference of degree between poets. It is something which had happened to the mind of England between the time of Donne or Lord Herbert of Cherbury and the time of Tennyson and Browning; it is the difference between the intellectual poet and the reflective poet. Tennyson and Browning are poets, and they think; but they do not feel their thought as immediately as the odour of a rose. A thought to Donne was an experience; it modified his sensibility. When a poet’s mind is perfectly equipped for its work, it is constantly amalgamating disparate experience; the ordinary man’s experience is chaotic, irregular, fragmentary. The latter falls in love, or reads Spinoza, and these two experiences have nothing to do with each other, or with the noise of the typewriter or the smell of cooking; in the mind of the poet these experiences are always forming new wholes.

—T.S. Eliot, The Metaphysical Poets

We All Expect You

What is needed is constant work, day and night, constant reading, study, will…. Every hour is precious for it…. Come to us, smash the vodka bottle, lie down and read…. Turgenev, if you like, whom you have not read.

You must drop your vanity, you are not a child … you will soon be thirty.
It is time!
I expect you…. We all expect you.

Anton Chekhov, in a letter to his brother.